Show Summary Details
Page of

References 

References

Chapter:
Visual Presentation of Data
Author(s):

Stacy Christiansen

Page of

PRINTED FROM AMA MANUAL OF STYLE ONLINE (www.amamanualofstyle.com). © American Medical Association, 2009. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the license agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in AMA Manual of Style Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy). 

Subscriber: null; date: 24 February 2017

References

1. Style Manual Committee, Council of Science Editors. Scientific Style and Format: The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers. 7th ed. New York, NY: Rockefeller University Press, in cooperation with the Council of Science Editors, Reston, VA; 2006.Find this resource:

    2. The Chicago Manual of Style. 15th ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003.Find this resource:

      3. Huth EJ. Writing and Publishing in Medicine. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.Find this resource:

        4. Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, Altman DG. Survival plots of time-to-event outcomes in clinical trials: good practice and pitfalls. Lancet. 2002;359(9318):1686-1689.Find this resource:

        5. Peterson SM. Editing Science Graphs. Reston, VA: Council of Biology Editors; 1999. CBE Guidelines No. 2.Find this resource:

          6. Tufte ER. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press; 1983.Find this resource:

            7. Schriger DL, Cooper RJ. Achieving graphical excellence: suggestions and methods for creating high-quality visual displays of experimental data. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(1):75-87.Find this resource:

            8. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D; for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001;285(15):1987-1991.Find this resource:

            9. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al; for the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008-2012.Find this resource:

            10. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF; for the QUOROM Group. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354(9193):1896-1900.Find this resource:

            11. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al; for the STARD Group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):1-6.Find this resource:

            12. Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI. Medical Decision Making. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1988.Find this resource:

              13. Hadorn DC. Use of algorithms in clinical guideline development. In: Clinical Practice Guideline Development: Methodology Perspectives. Rockville, MD: US Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research; 1994:93-104.Find this resource:

                14. Pearson H. Imagine manipulation: CSI: cell biology. Nature. 2005;434(7036): 952–953.Find this resource:

                15. Scientific Illustration Committee of the Council of Biology Editors. Illustrating Science: Standards for Publication. Bethesda, MD: Council of Biology Editors; 1988.Find this resource:

                  16. Cleveland WS. The Elements of Graphing Data. Rev ed. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press; 1994.Find this resource:

                    17. Singer PA, Feinstein AR. Graphical display of categorical data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(3):231-236.Find this resource:

                    18. Rossner M. How to guard against image fraud. Scientist. 2006;20(3):24.Find this resource:

                    Previous | Next