Show Summary Details
Page of



Ethical and Legal Considerations

Annette Flanagin

Page of

PRINTED FROM AMA MANUAL OF STYLE ONLINE ( © American Medical Association, 2009. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the license agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in AMA Manual of Style Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy). 

Subscriber: null; date: 25 February 2017


1. Richards JA. Note: confidentially speaking: protecting the press from liability for broken confidential promises. Washington Law Rev. 1992;67:501.Find this resource:

    2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.Find this resource:

      3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Updated February 2006. Accessed September 9, 2006.

      4. Council of Science Editors. CSE’s white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Accessed January 3, 2007.

      5. World Association of Medical Editors. WAME recommendations on publication ethics policies for medical journals. Accessed September 9, 2006.

      6. Committee on Publication Ethics. A code of conduct for editors of biomedical journals. Accessed September 9, 2006.

      7. Cummings P, Rivara FP. Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(1):11-13.Find this resource:

      8. Marshall E. Suit alleges misuse of peer review. Science. 1995;270(5244):1912-1914.Find this resource:

      9. Smith R. Opening up BMJ peer review: a beginning that should lead to complete transparency. BMJ. 1999;318(7175):4-5.Find this resource:

      10. Godlee F. Making Reviewers Visible: Openness, Accountability, And Credit. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2762-2765.Find this resource:

      11. BMC Medicine. Instructions for BMC Medicine authors. Accessed September 9, 2006.

      12. Branzburg v Hayes, 408 US 665 (1972).Find this resource:

        13. Lening C, Cohen H. Journalists’ Privilege to Withhold Information in Judicial and Other Proceedings: State Shield Statutes. CRS Report for Congress. Order Code RL32806. March 8, 2005. Accessed November 2, 2005.

        14. Kenworthy B. Branzburg v. Hayes, reporters’ privilege & circuit courts. First Amendment Center. July 12, 2005. Accessed November 2, 2005.

        15. Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 113 S Ct 27866 (1993).Find this resource:

          16. Gold JA, Zaremski MJ, Lev ER, Shefrin DH. Daubert v Merrell Dow: the Supreme Court tackles scientific evidence in the courtroom. JAMA. 1993;270(24):2964-2967.Find this resource:

          17. Cukier v American Medical Association, 630 NE 2d 1198 (Ill App 1 Dist 1994).Find this resource:

            18. Reporter’s Privilege. Chapter 7835, Illinois Complied Statutes, Act 5, Article VIII, Part 9, Sections 901–909. 735 ILCS 5/8-901 to 909.Find this resource:

              19. Henke v US Department of Commerce and the National Science Foundation, 83 F3d 1445 (US App 1996).Find this resource:

                20. Peer review and the courts. Nature. 1996;384(6604):1.Find this resource:

                21. Parrish DM, Bruns DE. US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2839-2841.Find this resource:

                22. Gifis SH. Law Dictionary. 5th ed. Hauppauge, NY: Barrons Educational Series Inc; 2003.Find this resource:

                  23. Bishop CT. How to Edit a Scientific Journal. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press; 1984.Find this resource:

                    Previous | Next